When an subject is controversial, one cannot hope to tell the truth. One can only show how one came to hold whatever opinion one does hold. One can only give one's audience the the chance of drawing their own conclusions as they observe the limitations, the predjudices, the idiosyncracies of the speaker.

- Virginia Woolf

Friday, June 30, 2006

Dateline 6/30/06

I finally go through to my "Doctor" today (in quotes because it is really just a giant urban clinic and the person on the phone wasn't sure if my PCP actually worked there) I was told by blue cross that i would need a referal to get the damn tetnas booster that i need to complete my vaccines for grad school and that I have been trying to get for weeks.
The whole vaccine form has been a saga. Some Background: BU has records of my vaccinations but wouldnt release them to Drexel. I Called Blue cross patient services, they told me to call my PCP. First I tried calling the office and got a disconnected number message. after calling Blue again and getting another number, I got a ans. machine and left a message. Message not returned. after calling 2 more times, I got a hold of someone who told me to call my peditrician who gave most of the vaccines because they would not certify vaccines they did not give. After two rounds of faxing, i learned that I need a tetnaus booster and a PPD test. So I called Blue who gave me the info for a clinic next to my house except that they wouldnt pay for it without a referal from the PCP. After about 3 calls (apparently the secretaries in this office are afraid of the phoe or something) I got through to someone who could make me an appointment but wouldnt because I wasn't in the system. She transfered me to someone she said would register me: i sat on hold about 5 minutes ad then got an answering machine. ON HOLD FOR A MACHINE?...and they didn't even return the message! Anyways, I finally got through today and after a marathon or being transfeerd and giving my personal info out 3 times, i learned that they would not give a vaccine without a physical (i just got one from the army) so I have one of those next week. at least it is after work. The saga continues...

Labels:

Monday, June 26, 2006

Opinion : College economics

     I was jogging through the area around Harvard this evening and looking at the giant homes along some streets in Cambridge.  I have heard that rich people by these homes for their children while they attend Harvard U.  I am not sure that my parents would do that for me even if they could afford to (they can't), but then I considered what a great idea buying these houses is.  Figure that a rich parent buys a townhouse condominium for $3 million for their kid to live in for 4 years.  Assuming that more rich kids will be going to Harvard and will need someplace to live, the parents can then likely sell this house for $3 million to another family, recouping their initial investment.  In that way their kid gets a great place to live in college and it doesn’t really cost them anything.  However, that is just the beginning.  A Harvard education only costs about $120K.  If your town house real estate appreciates 4% in those 4 years (in fact really lagging the recent real estate market), you essentially will not pay anything to send your kid to Harvard.  If the house value increases with the average real estate for the area, you will actually make money on you child's education, even after accounting for broker fees and the BMW that they will need to get around.  

     So an already rich family will make money sending their child to an institution that should ensure the family's continued prosperity.  Now at the same time, poorer students will shell out money that they can't make back to live in crappier housing, saddling themselves with long term debt that even in the best scenario will slow their rise to societies upper classes.  Being firmly in the latter category, my nee-jerk reaction is that this is not fair, but then I thought about it some more.  For most of my time at BU, I lived in the student village, a luxury apt complex with a view of the Charles River.  These apartments were rumored to be worth nearly a quarter million dollars if put on the market as condos, a price that I could never have afforded.  Had the university not financed my loans or rented this property to me I would not have been able to live there, or attend classes at BU for that matter.  In this way, the loaning and renting system lowers the bar for poorer individuals to live better.  The drawback, however, is that it leaves them poorer than when they started.  The question is, as I sit with my huge loan debt in my crappy rented apartment in Cambridge and look out at those more fortunate (but not more educated) than me, should I appreciate the system that got me to this point, or should I hate it for all its inherent unfairness

Labels:

Sunday, June 25, 2006

Opinion : Middle class debt

My father is always complaining about how much debt my family is in. Now my father often complains for the sake of complaining, but a closer look does reveal a serious problem. My parents have a large debt load, with home equity loans, PLUS loans, and credit card debt that may never be paid off. They are currently floating by solvently with bad credit because of the continued presence of easy credit through refinancing. Furthermore, they live paycheck to paycheck and have no investments or retirement savings. But how did they get to this point?
To start with, they are not living beyond thier means. So many people facing bankruptcy are in the position because simply spent too much. This is also the case with people defaulting on ARMs, who have only themselves to blame for knowingly taking on larger mortgages than they could handle. This is not the case with my parents, however. They live in a modest house in a crappy neighborhood that was purchased over 25 years ago. Both of the cars they drive are used, one of which was a gift from my grandparents. They do not own any art or boats or serious luxury items short of my father's motorcycle, which he bought cheap from a friend and has likely appreciated in value. The TV's they own were gifts and their computer is 8yrs. old. They have not taken a proper vacation in over a decade and rarely go out on the town. They contribute little to their children's education (not even hitting their annual EFC) and anything they gave in the last few years has been through loans. Spending can not really account for their economic problems.
The next most common cause of financial hardship is a sudden unexpected event or situation such as losing a job, divorcing, or needing surgery. This does not apply either, although my parents have no security blanket for this sort of thing. They have been married for over 25 years and are both in nearly perfect health. They have steady incomes and have been employed continuously for years (over 30 in my fathers case). They have workers comp and health insurance. Dental surgery was needed a few years ago, yet the total cost was less than 10% of annual income, was financed interest free, and no disruption occurred. There are simply no discrete steps in my family's march towards debt. Indeed it has been a slow, insidious march over at least 2 decades.

So what can account for my parent's financial situation? Cases similar to theirs are often ignored by politicians, economists, and planners as unusual or complex. It is much easier to point to people who are irresponsible or unlucky to account for americans' debt problems. Yet there must be many more families that can sympathize, middle class people who do their best and don't get ahead. I am not an economist, but I have been putting some thought into what is causing my parents economic problems, so that maybe we can fix them, or at least I can avoid them in the future. There are 5 trends that stand out.

1. Lack of planning. This is most obvious when looking at their retirement and children's college situation. My parents were always content to live paycheck to paycheck, and simply did not put much money aside. In economic terms, they are exposing themselves to more risk. If your expenses and income are predictable, this works fine, however, this is rarely the case. If something comes up, say the water heater breaks, then the cost will need to be financed and interest payments will soon make small repairs into more costly situations. They have no retirement other than social security. This shows that longterm plans and risks were simply never considered or accounted for.

2. Lack of investment/financial understanding. I don't think my parents really understand how financial markets work. They have never made any investments that I know of, stocks, bonds, real estate or otherwise. Quite simply, if you don't have any assets that can make money, you will never get ahead. Professionals might wonder how any Americans aren't familiar with the economic system that holds this country together, but I would counter by asking: how would an average middle class worker learn about investing. This is not taught in schools, other family members are not much help, and financial planners are usually only interested in their own bottom line, not educating consumers. In fact, the one investment my parents made was to put my very meager trust fund (savings bonds from an aunt when I was born) into a mutual fund at the suggestion of M&T bank. My parents took the advice and put it all into a single fund, which managed to actually lose money (during the late 90's and before the dot com bust, mind you). After about 3 years, they simply put the money back into a savings acct. Adjusted for inflation, the trust fund was worth less when I got to college than when I was born. My parents are a representative case of the many Americans not benefiting from the investment prosperity that the economy is generating; when they have capital, they simply do not know how to use it.

3. Wages that do not keep pace with inflation. Steady employment is a wonderful thing, especially if you love your job, as both my parents do. Problem is, they are making less and less money at them. When me and my sister were born, my mother stayed home and raised us. In the mid 80s, my father's income was sufficient to support the family by itself. While I do not have (or will not disclose) exact numbers, he can't be making any more now than he was then. A family of 4 at my father's income today would barely clear the federal poverty line. While it is true that he works at the same level in the same job, inflation has destroyed his hourly wage, and devalued his now more experienced labor.

4. Inability to stick to short term budgets. This may seem like the easiest problem to control, but I believe it is more insidious than people think. Lets say that you plan to spent $100 for groceries each week and on average you go over this by $3. Now $3 does not seem like much and an extra box of cereal or bag of apples is hardly living extravagantly. But this can add up over time. That comes to about $150 a year (a week and a half of food), and over 20 years comes to over $3000 dollars. Economists would add opportunity costs such as the interest the money would gain in a savings account, but they do not go far enough. Let's say that the groceries are purchased with a credit card where the extra $3 raises the average daily balance. With a 12% a month compounding interest rate, those $3 extra dollars a week (even with occasional principal payments) can lead to thousands and thousands of dollars in long term debt. Spending an extra $20 on Christmas presents or not budgeting the gratuity for restaurant meals can have the same disasterous effect.


5. Not taking advantage of positive circumstances Economists and policy makers often assume that people will make rational decisions in their own self interest. This seems to rarely be the case, however. Sometimes non-economic factors are key. For instance, my father is a very low paid auto mechanic in an area with a high demand for that skilled trade. A glance at the classifieds reveals that he could increase his salary almost 25% by working for a dealer and over 50% working for a local bus company. The problem is that he likes where he works, the small business owner who employs him has been a family friend, and he has no intention of leaving. Be it idealism or lack of ambition, this irrational decision is a major contributor to long-term debt.
Other examples of missing positive circumstances may simply be out of ignorance. Someone who does not follow economic news would not know when interest rates are low and they should refinance, for instance. They recently took out a Upromise account that gains little interest because they did not want to give their credit card information to the company (if only they felt the same way about giving the credit card info to retail outlets…). Without positive financial events, the negative ones tend to stand out evven more.


I hope that this analysis will help me avoid similar problems in my life. Admittedly, I am off to a bad start, however. As I prepare to enter graduate school, I am facing more debt in student loans than my parents have amassed over the last 2 decades. My debt is on education, which carries no guarantees, does not build equity, and will not appreciate in value. Furthermore, it prevents me from acquiring and investing in things that have real value. My life will therefore serve to answer the question of whether education and fiscal intelligence can break the cycle of middle class poverty.

Labels:

Saturday, June 24, 2006

Dateline 6/24/2006

I went to see NIN at the tweeter center last night with some of my co-workers. It was a great show. The weather somehow held out (everyone was pissed that I got the cheap uncovered seats) and it turned out to be a good night. NIN has a lot of songs that lend themselves to live performances and Reznor can still rock. Only crappy part is that it took hours to get there and get out of the parking lot. And why the hell is the tweeter center so far from Boston...

Labels:

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Dateline 6/11/06

This has been a productive, if boring weekend. To start with, I got my first paycheck in over a month. too bad its pretty much already spent. I did buy a microwave on amazon.com though. More importantly for my finaces is the grad-school financial aid package that finally came. Unfortinately there was no grants(which is as expected) but I will be able to take the whole amount (about 38K for next year) out in Federal loans. Nothing makes a weekend like doubling your lifetime debt on an investment with no apreciation or equity...
In other news, I got called for jury duty by the the state of Massachusetts, ironically on the day before I move to Pennsylvania. The court system here seems to depend on unfortunate local students to supply most of its pools. They have this rule that you only have to serve once every 3 years however, so I will be getting exempted this time. They have now summonsed me 3 times in the last 2.5 years, apparently violating their own guidlines. Oh well, I only have to live here for about 7 more weeks.

Labels:

Saturday, June 10, 2006

opinion : websites and kids

Myspace.com seems to constantly be in the news lately (no pun intended on the fact that it is owned by news corp.) The problem is that the media is really being unfair to the site. many media companies (driven by competition with News?) portray the site as a place for predators to pray on innocent children. While it is does occasionally lead to children getting abused, so does walking down the street. actually I would argue the website is much safer. First of all, there is no physical contact possible through the website. For contact to be made explicit directions and arrangements need to be given, which implies some level of consent on behalf of the parties. Second, the communication that lead to the meeting is recorded and traceable. God forbid your child gets kidnapped, you should be so lucky to know where they were going and with whom (fake online aliases are easily cracked by trained law enforcement agents). And saying that the child is innocent is pushing it. In many cases (such as this one) the child had to lie to get on the site in the first place. As in fireworks and lawnmowers, those safety rules are there for a reason.

While the child-predator problem may occasionally turn up, the media is also recking social networking sites (mainly myspace) by ommitting a proper description of the actual demographics. I would estimate (because I can't be bothered to prove it) that the vast majority of users on these sites are bored college students (like me). Some sites, such as Facebook.com are actually restricted to only these users. The sites were designed for and are primarily used for young adults to meet peple with common interests and chat with them to fill time or learn something new. The problem is that at some point, the online community filtered down from responsible college students to wannabe-hip teenage girls. While there is nothind wrong with expanding your social circle outside of your clique, these users were immature and often irresponsible. It is almost always these users who fall victim to con artists, shady commercial products, or much worse. This problem has been excerbated by companies that have increasingly pitched these sites to teens. I would imagine that more gullible users is great for buisinesses that sell cheap things (pokemon ringtones, anyone?) but the consequences are now starting to come to light with cases of child abductions and such. These cases will not bring down social networking sites, however because they simply do not effect the vast majority of users.

Labels:

Saturday, June 03, 2006

Dateline 6/3/06

This summer is definitely not going as I planned. Last Thursday I found out that I was likely to get forcefully evicted as part of an ongoing dispute between my new roommate and her landlord. Not only was this bad news for me, but also for my friend Jason, who had to be out of his current apt by the first and who was expecting to move in with me. Upon learning this we went back to jason's apt. and searched Craig's list and found a few good matches. One of those told us to come over and check the place out right then, so we did. Within an hour we had another apt. That was a strange afternoon.

Then of course came the moving. Uhaul was booked but we found a local company that rented us a van for 24 hours. The move was planned to take place in several steps over 2 days and went better than I could have imagined. We ended up working with the girls moving out of the apt to get things in faster and nothing seems to have been lost or broken. Not bad. Anyway now I am settling in and trying to get the internet hooked up.

Labels: